I am loving that things are finally moving to make European countries less dependent on US software (especially cloud providers), but I am disappointed that there isn't more of a focus on open source software.
There are several government programs within EU counties to fund the development of open source software. We need WAY more of that, coordinated at the EU level.
The best way to avoid being beholden to big tech is to fund viable open source alternatives.
Adron 🤘🏻
in reply to Not Just Bikes 🇳🇱 • • •Damax
in reply to Not Just Bikes 🇳🇱 • • •the French and German governments open sourced this month a software to replace Notion
github.com/suitenumerique/docs
And there are more
lasuite.numerique.gouv.fr
GitHub - suitenumerique/docs: A collaborative note taking, wiki and documentation platform that scales. Built with Django and React. Opensource alternative to Notion or Outline.
GitHubDamax
in reply to Damax • • •GitHub - uscneps/Awesome-European-Tech: Up-to-date, community-driven list of Awesome European Tech projects! all focusing on privacy, sustainability, and innovation. The goal is to support European startups and projects (Compliance to GDPR, UK GDPR, Swiss
GitHubStephen
in reply to Not Just Bikes 🇳🇱 • • •Not Just Bikes 🇳🇱
in reply to Stephen • • •Guus der Kinderen
in reply to Not Just Bikes 🇳🇱 • • •Absolutely! There are interesting funding opportunities that, frankly, get underexposed.
Are you familiar with @nlnet ? Their core business is to support organisations and people who contribute to an open internet, by funding projects and making available a slew of services. I have collaborated with them in a couple of projects, which has been an excellent experience.
generationX
in reply to Not Just Bikes 🇳🇱 • • •yes to all you said + Please not only fund but also use the result and make that success visible to the public. Make them/us aware. Otherwise the money is wasted.
Fund a tool or project and use it. Make the people that they want to benefit from the possibilities.
Examples (maybe they are bad but the idea should become clear.)
Fund Matrix and Element and use it for communication with a doctor, announcement of traffic jam or emergency notifications bla bla. Create good use cases.
lgsp is moving
in reply to Not Just Bikes 🇳🇱 • • •I'll call you Jason "viable alternative" Slaughter from now on 🤪
Just kidding. I agree 100% . We need viable alternatives in many more areas, beyond software and transportation.
Mike Perham
in reply to Not Just Bikes 🇳🇱 • • •So true. Shout out to NLnet: they are doing some great work here, funding both immediate and longer-term OSS projects. Anyone can apply!
nlnet.nl/project/current.html
NLnet; Current projects
nlnet.nlgloria dei
in reply to Not Just Bikes 🇳🇱 • • •Andy Wootton
in reply to Not Just Bikes 🇳🇱 • • •Martijn 🇪🇺🇳🇱
in reply to Not Just Bikes 🇳🇱 • • •I am part of a group of experienced IT people that have experience in building cloud platforms (a la aws / azure etc).
We'd LOVE ❤️ to build a NON-profit, European created & operated public cloud and only charge for costs... (since we don't like the idea of yet another big tech firm squeezing money from people)
Problem is that we have no clue where to even get started with support from government or Europe.... which we'd need because I doubt we'd get VC funding. 😋
bert hubert 🇺🇦🇪🇺🇺🇦
in reply to Not Just Bikes 🇳🇱 • • •derptron
in reply to Not Just Bikes 🇳🇱 • • •I think there's probably a case for some software not being open source. It does let your adversaries have a look at code running on all your important stuff. The more is automated and such in your infrastructure the more impact a zero-day could have.
Your government should own the code though, or be able to look at and audit it. That's a must. It's nuts to buy something from some company that might have a shutoff in it.
When possible though it should be open source.
Dr. Dek 👨🚀🐧🚀 )
in reply to Not Just Bikes 🇳🇱 • • •I really want to see them funding a new OS and completely ignore the linux world. Sounds like them 🥲
Light Owl ☸️
in reply to Not Just Bikes 🇳🇱 • • •What assurance do you have that those governments won't pick really inefficient, cumbersome-to-maintain, bogged-down-with-complexity OpenSource projects, which get mired in problems down the road - BUT have the virtue of having more bells and whistles (conveniences, simplifications) that the end users will like?
Do those governments have incentive to pick the mature, lean-and-mean #OpenSource choices, which have less bells and whistles, -OR- the bloated, cumbersome, Johhny-come-lately Open Source choices, *with more end-user convenience*, and are likely to run way over budget in the longer term? I predict they'll choose the second kind of choice, in a short-sighted, desperate attempt to bring the most convenience to the end users. And it'll bog down in a few years - being really hard to maintain and support; the project being a failure. They'll return back to closed source in a few years - *and thereby get all the end-user convenience they were wanting all along*, realizing they have to pay for it.
Funambolo
in reply to Not Just Bikes 🇳🇱 • • •the European parliament has had a Digital Sovereignty Think Tank for some years:
europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/e…
I think the problem for them has been the same as for everyone: there has not been a really strong motive to move away from the very mature and quite convenient US-based services.
Jordan Maris 🇪🇺 🇺🇦 #NAFO
in reply to Not Just Bikes 🇳🇱 • • •Overcoming barriers to Open Source procurement in the European Union
Open Source InitiativeNot Just Bikes 🇳🇱 reshared this.
Paul
in reply to Not Just Bikes 🇳🇱 • • •David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)
in reply to Not Just Bikes 🇳🇱 • • •Flam
in reply to Not Just Bikes 🇳🇱 • • •Unfortunately, that opens up new problems. There was some news article recently about third party companies (lacking in-depth nowledge about the software) claimed support contracts with goverment institutions and grabbed tax money, while the actual developers of open source software were largely left out.
The article (german, paid article): heise.de/news/Wie-Behoerden-un…
Wie Behörden und ihre Auftragnehmer Open-Source-Software ausbeuten
Christian Wölbert (heise online)ednl 🇪🇺
in reply to Not Just Bikes 🇳🇱 • • •Hey, you may have influenced my YouTube algorithm; this was in my top recs just now: youtube.com/watch?v=Bu3S2A02FF…
It's a reaction to/review of eupolicy.social/@eu_os/1141153… and eu-os.gitlab.io
EU OS
EU OS Proof-of-ConceptBaessando ☭🇧🇷🇵🇸🇺🇳
in reply to Not Just Bikes 🇳🇱 • • •This is totally related to the motto Public Money, Public Code of @fsfe
fsfe.org/news/2025/news-202503…
FSFE symposium: Public Money? Public Code! in practice - FSFE
FSFE - Free Software Foundation Europeblausand 🐟
in reply to Not Just Bikes 🇳🇱 • • •@EUCommission @EUCouncil
mmu_man
in reply to Not Just Bikes 🇳🇱 • • •vladfedchenko
in reply to Not Just Bikes 🇳🇱 • • •